She said there was “total ownership of what has been agreed within the EU” but that there was “no ownership” in the British Parliament. Before and after the vote, the EU insisted that it did not see the withdrawal agreement as a renegotiation of your point of view. The main stumbling block was the backstop – the “insurance policy,” which aimed to ensure that there would be no return to a visible border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland after Brexit. “The withdrawal agreement is and remains the best and only way to ensure an orderly exit of the UK from the European Union,” said Council President Donald Tusk. The backstop was agreed by the UK/EU as an insurance policy in order to avoid a hard border in all scenarios. We hope that it will never be used or that it will be quickly replaced by a future relationship agreement. But it is necessary and tonight`s developments at Westminster do not change that. #Brexit After the devastating defeat of her draft withdrawal agreement, when more than 100 of her own MPs defied her, it now seems that she can get a majority in favour of an approach that could revive this plan – the operational word is certainly “could”.” It is a carefully negotiated compromise that reconciles the UK`s position in the area of customs and the internal market with the prevention of a hard border and the protection of the integrity of the EU customs union and the internal market. It has not escaped the people Theresa May said until recently that the backstop should be part of the withdrawal agreement. One such person is the Welsh First Minister, Mark Drakeford, who has described the Prime Minister`s assertion that she could renegotiate the agreement in light of today`s votes as “staggering.” Heresa May seems to have new hope of a positive result on Tuesday, when MPs begin, which once seemed to them to be a potentially late Brexit vote.
This latest shot of adrenaline for their deal that brings him back from the brink of oblivion, if only for a moment, comes in the form of what is now called Brady`s change. The Prime Minister`s official spokesman said that “as soon as possible” there would be a second useful vote on any participation in Brussels. The Prime Minister promised a new meaningful vote on February 13 and a new motion that could be amended in case that request was rejected or if the government did not secure a new agreement. But we don`t have time anymore. It will have to reflect the opposition of the House of Commons to the lack of agreement. We will look at the changes that will be needed if no progress has been made at this stage. We continue to work to ensure that we do not reach the pitfall without agreement on March 29. Loyalty to your party in these circumstances should be absolutely at the bottom of the list, and that is for me. Then, when I look at my party and how it works, I despair. I despair of what is happening to our country. Last year, the UK and the EU agreed that such a measure was necessary to comply with the Good Friday peace deal, but the Brexiteer Conservatives who oppose it believe that the measure that could permanently bind the UK into a customs union and separate Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK could remain permanently linked. A government source said of the next phase of the Brexit debate: “I hope the Prime Minister will collect air miles because he will not come back with many other things.” Ouch The Guardian, the Financial Times and the Daily Mirror have similar views on Brexit news; Brussels has announced that Theresa May intends to renegotiate the withdrawal agreement, but Brussels has said it will not be conciliatory.